In this article, Li and Gleitman are questioning the implications of the WhorfâSapir linguistic relativity hypothesis. Â
The hypothesis argues (based on linguistic studies of Mayan populations) that the language of a society determines the membersâ spatial reasoning, or the way they think about locations and distances. The Mayans use a spatial-coordinate system (ex. âto the northâ) as opposed to a viewer-perspective system (ex. âto the leftâ).
Li and Gleitman question the findings, and they devise a research that involves only English speakers, but where they manipulate landmark cues. While they do not claim to have proven the WhorfâSapir linguistic relativity hypothesis wrong, they argue that the availability of landmark cues plays a larger role in spatial reasoning than the linguistic system itself.